Care should be taken to ensure that the proper execution of a module is not compromised by a lack of system resources. If a module is unable to open sufficient files to perform its task, it should fail gracefully, or request additional resources. Specifically, the quantities manipulated by the setrlimit(2) family of commands should be taken into consideration.

Generally, the module may wish to establish the identity of the user requesting a service. This may not be the same as the username returned by pam_get_user(). Indeed, that is only going to be the name of the user under whose identity the service will be given. This is not necessarily the user that requests the service.

In other words, user X runs a program that is setuid-Y, it grants the user to have the permissions of Z. A specific example of this sort of service request is the su program: user joe executes su to become the user jane. In this situation X=joe, Y=root and Z=jane. Clearly, it is important that the module does not confuse these different users and grant an inappropriate level of privilege.

The following is the convention to be adhered to when juggling user-identities.

Note, if a module wishes to modify the identity of either the uid or euid of the running process, it should take care to restore the original values prior to returning control to the Linux-PAM library.

Prior to calling the conversation function, the module should reset the contents of the pointer that will return the applications response. This is a good idea since the application may fail to fill the pointer and the module should be in a position to notice!

The module should be prepared for a failure from the conversation. The generic error would be PAM_CONV_ERR, but anything other than PAM_SUCCESS should be treated as indicating failure.

To ensure that the authentication tokens are not left lying around the items, PAM_AUTHTOK and PAM_OLDAUTHTOK, are not available to the application: they are defined in <security/pam_modules.h>. This is ostensibly for security reasons, but a maliciously programmed application will always have access to all memory of the process, so it is only superficially enforced. As a general rule the module should overwrite authentication tokens as soon as they are no longer needed. Especially before free()'ing them. The Linux-PAM library is required to do this when either of these authentication token items are (re)set.

Not to dwell too little on this concern; should the module store the authentication tokens either as (automatic) function variables or using pam_[gs]et_data() the associated memory should be over-written explicitly before it is released. In the case of the latter storage mechanism, the associated cleanup() function should explicitly overwrite the *data before free()'ing it: for example,

/*
 * An example cleanup() function for releasing memory that was used to
 * store a password.
 */

int cleanup(pam_handle_t *pamh, void *data, int error_status)
{
    char *xx;

    if ((xx = data)) {
        while (*xx)
            *xx++ = '\0';
        free(data);
    }
    return PAM_SUCCESS;
}